use docComment for statement description

pull/118/head
Jon Eugster 2 years ago
parent 9ef4122e94
commit 0b14489911

@ -27,8 +27,9 @@ and `World` strings can be anything.
The core of a level is the `Statement`, which is the exercise that should be proven:
```lean
/-- For all natural numbers $n$, we have $0 + n = n$. -/
@[simp]
Statement MyNat.zero_add
"For all natural numbers $n$, we have $0 + n = n$."
(n : ) : 0 + n = n := by
Hint "You can start a proof by `induction n`."
induction n with n hn
@ -44,17 +45,47 @@ Statement MyNat.zero_add
rfl
```
The first two arguments (name, attributes, and description) are optional. Thereafter you have a statement and a proof.
##### Proof
- The proof should always be a tactic proof, i.e. the `:= by` is mandatory.
- In the proof you can use `Hint "text"` to display text if the goal state in-game matches the one where `Hint` is placed. For more options about hints, see below.
- In the proof you can add a `Branch` that runs an alternativ tactic sequence, which helps setting `Hints` in different places. The `Branch` does not affect the main proof and does not need to finish any goals.
- If you specify a name (`MyNat.zero_add`), this lemma will be available in future levels. (Note that a future level must also import this level, so that Lean knows about the added statement). The name must be *fully qualified*.
- If you add a description (i.e. non-Lean exercise statement), it will be shown above the exercise. It supports Markdown (including katex).
The proof must always be a tactic proof, i.e. `:= by` is a mandatory part of the syntax.
There are a few extra tactics that help you structuring the proof:
- `Hint`: You can use `Hint "text"` to display text if the goal state in-game matches
the one where `Hint` is placed. For more options about hints, see below.
- `Branch`: In the proof you can add a `Branch` that runs an alternativ tactic sequence, which
helps setting `Hints` in different places. The `Branch` does not affect the main
proof and does not need to finish any goals.
- `Template`/`Hole`: not implemented yet, but used to provide a sample proof template.
##### Statement Name (optional)
If you specify a name (`MyNat.zero_add`), this lemma will be available in future levels.
(Note that a future level must also import this level,
so that Lean knows about the added statement).
The name must be *fully qualified*. (TODO: is that still true? Did we implement namespaces?)
##### Doc Comment (optional)
There are three places where the documentation comment appears:
1. as doc comment when hovering over the theorem
2. as exercise description at the top of the level: ``Theorem `zero_add`: yada yada.``
3. in the inventory. This can be overwritten by using
`LemmaDoc MyNat.zero_add "different yada yada"` as one might want to add a more detailed
description there including examples etc.
Both latter points support Markdown (including katex).
##### Attributes (optional)
the `@[ attributes ]` prefix should work just like you know it from the `theorem` keyword.
#### Introduction/Conclusion
Optionally, you can add a `Introduction "some text"` and `Conclusion "some text"` to your level. the introduction will always be visible on top, the conclusion is displayed once the level is solved.
Optionally, you can add a `Introduction "some text"` and `Conclusion "some text"` to your level.
The introduction will be shown at the beginning, the conclusion is displayed once the level
is solved.
#### Lemmas/Tactics/Definitions
@ -68,7 +99,8 @@ NewLemma MyNat.add_zero
NewDefinition Nat
```
Once added, items will be available in all future levels/worlds, unless you disable them for a particular level with
Once added, items will be available in all future levels/worlds,
unless you disable them for a particular level with
```lean
DisabledTactic tauto
@ -82,7 +114,8 @@ OnlyTactic rw rfl apply
OnlyLemma MyNat.add_zero
```
Lastly, all items need documentation entries (which are imported in the level), see more about that below. There is also explains the `LemmaTab`
Lastly, all items need documentation entries (which are imported in the level),
see more about that below. There is also explains the `LemmaTab` keyword.
### World

@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ def checkInventoryDoc (type : InventoryType) (ref : Ident) (name : Name := ref.g
name := name
category := if type == .Lemma then s!"{n.getPrefix}" else ""
content := s })
logInfoAt ref (m!"Missing {type} Documentation: {name}, used provided default (e.g. " ++
m!"statement description) instead. If you want to write your own description, add " ++
logInfoAt ref (m!"Missing {type} Documentation: {name}, used default (e.g. provided " ++
m!"docstring) instead. If you want to write a different description, add " ++
m!"`{type}Doc {name}` somewhere above this statement.")
/-- Documentation entry of a tactic. Example:
@ -305,13 +305,18 @@ partial def collectUsedInventory (stx : Syntax) (acc : UsedInventory := {}) : Co
return {acc with definitions := acc.definitions.insertMany ns}
) acc
#check expandOptDocComment?
/-- Define the statement of the current level. -/
elab attrs:Lean.Parser.Term.attributes ? "Statement" statementName:ident ? descr:str ? sig:declSig val:declVal : command => do
elab doc:docComment ? attrs:Parser.Term.attributes ?
"Statement" statementName:ident ? sig:declSig val:declVal : command => do
let lvlIdx ← getCurLevelIdx
let descr := match descr with
| none => none
| some s => s.getString
let docContent : Option String := match doc with
| none => none
| some s => match s.raw[1] with
| .atom _ val => val.dropRight 2 |>.trim -- some (val.extract 0 (val.endPos - ⟨2⟩))
| _ => none --panic "not implemented error message" --throwErrorAt s "unexpected doc string{indentD s.raw[1]}"
-- Save the messages before evaluation of the proof.
let initMsgs ← modifyGet fun st => (st.messages, { st with messages := {} })
@ -340,19 +345,19 @@ elab attrs:Lean.Parser.Term.attributes ? "Statement" statementName:ident ? descr
-- in that case.
logWarningAt name (m!"Environment already contains {fullName}! Only the existing " ++
m!"statement will be available in later levels:\n\n{origType}")
let thmStatement ← `(command| $[$attrs:attributes]? theorem $defaultDeclName $sig $val)
let thmStatement ← `(command| $[$doc]? $[$attrs:attributes]? theorem $defaultDeclName $sig $val)
elabCommand thmStatement
-- Check that statement has a docs entry.
checkInventoryDoc .Lemma name (name := fullName) (template := descr)
checkInventoryDoc .Lemma name (name := fullName) (template := docContent)
else
let thmStatement ← `(command| $[$attrs:attributes]? theorem $name $sig $val)
let thmStatement ← `(command| $[$doc]? $[$attrs:attributes]? theorem $name $sig $val)
elabCommand thmStatement
-- Check that statement has a docs entry.
checkInventoryDoc .Lemma name (name := fullName) (template := descr)
checkInventoryDoc .Lemma name (name := fullName) (template := docContent)
| none =>
let thmStatement ← `(command| $[$attrs:attributes]? theorem $defaultDeclName $sig $val)
let thmStatement ← `(command| $[$doc]? $[$attrs:attributes]? theorem $defaultDeclName $sig $val)
elabCommand thmStatement
let msgs := (← get).messages
@ -402,7 +407,7 @@ elab attrs:Lean.Parser.Term.attributes ? "Statement" statementName:ident ? descr
module := env.header.mainModule
goal := sig,
scope := scope,
descrText := descr
descrText := docContent
statementName := match statementName with
| none => default
| some name => currNamespace ++ name.getId

@ -7,10 +7,18 @@ Level 1
/- Missing doc -/
-- Shows warning on `foo.bar`:
Statement foo.bar "some text" : 5 ≤ 7 := by
-- Shows info on `foo.bar`:
/-- some text -/
Statement foo.bar : 5 ≤ 7 := by
simp
-- Shows warning on `foo.bar₂`:
Statement foo.bar2 : 3 ≤ 7 := by
simp
NewLemma foo.baz
DisabledTactic tauto
@ -20,7 +28,8 @@ DisabledTactic tauto
-- test that the command also works inside a namespace
namespace myNamespace
Statement anotherStatement "test" (n : Nat) : n + 0 = n := by
/-- test -/
Statement anotherStatement (n : Nat) : n + 0 = n := by
rfl
end myNamespace
@ -29,7 +38,8 @@ end myNamespace
LemmaDoc add_zero as "add_zero" in "Nat" "(nothing)"
Statement add_zero "test" (n : Nat) : n + 0 = n := by
/-- test -/
Statement add_zero (n : Nat) : n + 0 = n := by
rfl
Statement (n : Nat) : 0 + n = n := by
@ -47,3 +57,17 @@ NewLemma add_zero
theorem xy (n : Nat) : n + 0 = n := by
simp
/-! Test that it is possible to add `simp` attribute. -/
/-- Doc comment -/
@[simp]
Statement My.add_comm (n m : Nat) : n + m = m + n := by
rw [Nat.add_comm]
example (n m : Nat) : n + m = m + n := by
simp
#check My.add_comm

Loading…
Cancel
Save