You cannot select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
lean4game/server/nng/NNG/Levels/Proposition/Level_4.lean

60 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext

import NNG.Metadata
import NNG.MyNat.Addition
Game "NNG"
World "Proposition"
Level 4
Title "apply"
open MyNat
Introduction
"
Let's do the same level again:
$$
\\begin{CD}
P @>{h}>> Q @>{i}>> R \\\\
@. @VV{j}V \\\\
S @>>{k}> T @>>{l}> U
\\end{CD}
$$
We are given a proof $p$ of $P$ and our goal is to find a proof of $U$, or
in other words to find a path through the maze that links $P$ to $U$.
In level 3 we solved this by using `have`s to move forward, from $P$
to $Q$ to $T$ to $U$. Using the `apply` tactic we can instead construct
the path backwards, moving from $U$ to $T$ to $Q$ to $P$.
"
Statement
"We can solve a maze."
(P Q R S T U: Prop) (p : P) (h : P → Q) (i : Q → R)
(j : Q → T) (k : S → T) (l : T → U) : U := by
Hint "Our goal is to prove $U$. But $l:T\\implies U$ is
an implication which we are assuming, so it would suffice to prove $T$.
Tell Lean this by starting the proof below with
```
apply l
```
"
apply l
Hint "Notice that our assumptions don't change but *the goal changes*
from `U` to `T`.
Keep `apply`ing implications until your goal is `P`, and try not
to get lost!"
Branch
apply k
Hint "Looks like you got lost. \"Undo\" the last step."
apply j
apply h
Hint "Now solve this goal
with `exact p`. Note: you will need to learn the difference between
`exact p` (which works) and `exact P` (which doesn't, because $P$ is
not a proof of $P$)."
exact p
DisabledTactic «have»